Skip to main content

pgvector vs. Pinecone vs. SvectorDB - Pros, Cons, and Choosing the Right Tool

· 3 min read

Vector databases are transforming how applications handle vector search, making them ideal for image and document retrieval, recommendation systems, and RAG models. With various options available, selecting the right vector search solution can be challenging.

This article explores three popular choices: pgvector, Pinecone, and SvectorDB. We'll examine their pros and cons to help you choose the best tool for your next project.

pgvector​

pgvector is an open-source extension that adds vector search capabilities to your existing PostgreSQL database. Here’s what makes it a compelling choice:

Pros​

  • Open-source: Freely available with a large community supporting it.
  • Integrates with existing databases: Enhances PostgreSQL, allowing easy integration with your current database setup.
  • Vendor-neutral: Can be run on any cloud platform or on-premises, providing flexibility.

Cons​

  • Requires database management: You need to set up and maintain your PostgreSQL database.
  • Performance impact: Adding pgvector can affect the performance of other database operations.
  • Server costs: You must cover the server expenses to run your PostgreSQL database continuously.

Pinecone​

Pinecone offers a managed vector database service, simplifying the development and deployment of vector search applications. Here’s what makes Pinecone stand out:

Pros​

  • Hybrid search: Allows filtering results by both vector similarity and metadata within the same index.
  • Serverless option: Pay only for reads, writes, and storage, with no need to manage servers.
  • Market leader: Well-established in the vector search space.

Cons​

  • Vendor lock-in: A proprietary service that locks you into their platform.
  • Costs: More expensive than other options, including other managed services.

SvectorDB​

SvectorDB is a serverless vector database designed for production APIs, particularly those running on AWS environments. Here’s what sets it apart:

Pros​

  • Native AWS integration: Designed for AWS with CloudFormation support and familiar SDKs for a seamless AWS experience.
  • Serverless: Pay only for reads, writes, and storage, with no need to manage servers.
  • Built-in vectorizers: Simplifies the workflow by providing pre-built vectorizers for common models.
  • Cost-effective: Often 10x cheaper than Pinecone, making it a budget-friendly option.

Cons​

  • No hybrid search: Can only search by vector similarity.
  • Vendor lock-in: A proprietary service that ties you to their platform.

Making the Right Choice​

The best choice depends on your specific project needs. Here’s a quick guide to help you decide:

  • Choose pgvector if: You want an open-source solution that integrates with your existing PostgreSQL database and are comfortable managing your own infrastructure.
  • Choose Pinecone if: You need a hybrid search solution and are willing to pay a premium for a managed service.
  • Choose SvectorDB if: You’re looking for a cost-effective serverless solution with native AWS integration and built-in vectorizers.

Price Comparison Calculator

Queries per month

Writes per month

Vector Dimension

Vectors Stored

SvectorDB

$7.25/m

Pinecone

$83.44/m

SvectorDB calculations
FeatureAmountUnitsCostTotal
Queries1m1 Read Operation$5 / million$5.00
Writes100k1 Write Operation$20 / million$2.00
Storage500k vectors~1.018 GB$0.25 / GB$0.25
$7.25
Pinecone calculations
FeatureAmountUnitsCostTotal
Queries*1m10 Read Units$8.25 / million$82.50
Writes100k3 Write Units$2.00 / million$0.60
Storage500k vectors~1.018 GB$0.33 / GB$0.34
$83.44

* Fetching 32 nearest neighbours and returning metadata

Ready to experience the difference?

No credit card required